Modal interpretation of Quantum mechanics provides the framework for the Description of physical reality

Jerome Paschal Manyahi, Catherine Paschal

Abstract


Abstract

The question whether the quantum description of physical reality may be considered complete remains a challenge among a number of physicists even today. These challenges have their origins from the quantum measurement problem.

This paper tries to address this problem by focusing on the quantum logical perspective and particularly on how modal interpretation of quantum mechanics leads to the contextual description of physical reality. It argues that in classical mechanics any composite system can be completely described by the state of its parts. But in quantum mechanics the composite system can be in the entangled state and therefore cannot be described by giving a pure state for each subsystem.

By using the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics, we are led to the description of reality that cannot be postulated rather to the reality in postulation. Reality in postulation is contextual. In this sense transition from postulation of reality to reality in postulation is analogously similar to transition from Boolean structure to non – Boolean structure of the universe, from the localized systems to non – localized systems.


Keywords


Quantum logic, Modal interpretation, contextual, non locality, measurement problems

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD PDF

References


Jerome Manyahi, Students challenges in understanding Quantum Mechanics: Effect of the “logic Paradigm Shift”, Journal for Foundations and Applications of Physics, Vol. 7, No.1 (2020)

A., Einstein,, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen (1935), “Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete”, Physics Review 47 (1): 777-780.

A.J. Leggett, Science 307,871 (2005)

W. Michael Dickson, Quantum Chance and Non – locality: Probability and Non – locality in the Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press (1998)

N. David Mermin,There is no Quantum Measurement Problem, Physics Today, 76,6,62 (2022)

L.E. Ballentine, Limitations of the Projection Postulate, Foundations of Physics, Vol. 20, No. 11, 1990

Van Fraassen, Modal Interpretations of Quantum Logic, in Current Issues in Quantum Logic; 229 -258

M. R´edei, Quantum Logic in Algebraic Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, (1998)

J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, 12th. edition, Princeton, (1996).

G. Kalmbach, Orthomodular Lattices, Academic Press, San Diego, (1983)

Olivier Brunet, Partial Description of Quantum States, International Journal of Theoretical Physics (2008)

D. Dieks, Probability in Non – Collapse Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics, Beyond Quantum pp.345-354 (2007)

Itamar Pitowsky, Quantum Probability – Quantum Logic, Springer (1989)

Putnam 1979:178.

Shimon Malin, Nature loves to hide: Quantum Physics and the Nature of Reality. A Western Perspective. Oxford University Press, 2001

Berthold –Georg Englert, On Quantum Theory, The European Physical Journal D(2013) 67:238


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2394-3688

© Science Front Publishers